what would happen if you were responsible for what ensued when everybody realised that they either hated or didn't know how to love each other properly (let's say it was a big fight involving everybody for example) and yet you never saw harm come to yourself because everybody continually, yet intermittently thought that they loved you or simply didn't hate you because they couldn't handle the idea of permanently being a hater or simply not being able to love... ever? would they resort to love? would they simply create the idea of love and attach it to the nearest near-suitable candidate; perhaps someone at hand, someone immediately available? would they resort to hate, if someone perhaps pointed out the cyclic nature of their former contradiction, them having resorted to love momentarily whilst realising that it is, in fact unobtainable? is this a cycle that currently fuels the idiocratic approach to existence that most people subscribe to? hate is evil. love is good. sometimes the pursuit of love is fuelled by evil actions, thus nullifying the actual experience of whatever love may come from it. in that case, people may then tend to replace actual love with some of the elements that they associate with it - for example, sex. yet to replace something with a mere element of itself, pales in comparison to the experience of the entirety of what you are actually seeking. love itself needs to be reciprocated, in order for it to even ever actually exist. to hate is evil. i love.
Quote